The Christian Institute has initiated legal proceedings against Keir Starmer in a bid to finish civil service participation in controversial Pride marches.
The move follows similar motion earlier this yr which succeeded in ending Northumbria Police’s involvement in Pride.
Starmer has been named within the proceedings as a consequence of his position as Minister for the Civil Service.
In July of this yr a judge ruled that the participation of uniformed law enforcement officials in a Pride event had been illegal. That decision got here in response to a case brought by a gender critical lesbian, Linzi Smith, who argued that police participation in a Pride march indicated support for a particular political ideology and that consequently members of the general public couldn’t trust the police to fairly adjudicate disagreements referring to that ideology.
The Christian Institute is hoping that this principle can now be applied on a much greater scale. The group argues that allowing civil servants to attend Pride marches while on the clock – and hence at taxpayers’ expense – and brandishing “Civil Service pride” slogans, constitutes a breach of civil service impartiality.
Conrathe Gardner LLP and Tom Cross KC, who won the Northumbria case, have been deployed by The Christian Institute for his or her legal motion.
Simon Calvert, deputy director of The Christian Institute, said, “The law is evident that civil servants must maintain impartiality on controversial political issues. Whether one agrees with it or not, nobody can deny that the LGBTQ+ Pride movement and its hard-line gender ideology are profoundly political.
“Pride London, the one attended by Whitehall-based civil servants, even banned political parties because they don’t support their political demands, which include puberty blockers and gender self-ID. These are positions which the taxpayers who fund the Civil Service increasingly reject.”
Calvert noted that despite the highly contentious nature of the LGBT movement, government departments are removed from shy about showcasing their involvement in such causes.
“I actually have been working in public policy for a long time. I’ve been shocked by what number of civil servants wear Pride lanyards in our meetings with them, even when those meetings are specifically about conflicts with that ideology,” he said.
“Sitting in front of a phalanx of civil servants in rainbow lanyards gives the look that their minds are closed on the problems we’re discussing. It definitely doesn’t communicate the sort of neutrality that taxpayers expect of civil servants.”
If successful, the case could impact civil servants across all nations of the United Kingdom.

