PUBLIC services needs to be delivered “through places and folks that are trusted” and never in a “top-down, soulless” way, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, has said.
Mr Burnham’s remarks got here within the Theos annual lecture, which he delivered on Thursday, in Manchester. Mayor since 2017, he’s a former Cabinet minister in Gordon Brown’s government and has been tipped as a successor to Sir Keir Starmer as the subsequent leader of the Labour Party.
Mr Burnham spoke of a “big disconnect between people and politics, between government of every kind and everybody else”, which had led people to lose trust “in the power of politics to sort things”. He attributed this largely to “the demise of the local — local agency and native motion”.
The State still tried to supply services “in a really top-down, quite soulless way”, he said. The advantages system, for instance, operated a “soulless tick-box system, a ‘Computer says no’ approach that hammers the hope out of individuals at times”.
In the world of immigration and asylum, “the Home Office spends billions of kilos procuring accommodation through outsourced entities that don’t have any communication with the local communities when it comes to procuring that accommodation” and that “are making thousands and thousands of kilos of profits out of our system, but are providing very poor-standard accommodation”.
Mr Burnham continued: “Actually, for those who work from the underside with communities, wouldn’t we provide you with a rather more humane solution to that way of doing things?” A “paradigm shift” was needed, he said, “replacing the soulless with a recent vision for the local state, with trust, community, faith, belief, connection at its heart.”
A major moment had been when, as Health Secretary, he was presented with an inventory of areas to chop within the NHS, to lower your expenses. “The hospital chaplaincy service was primary on the list, and I said ‘No, no way.’ I said [this] because when my grandmother was in hospital within the last days of her life, and we arrived to see her, and he or she said ‘Has he been yet?’ she wasn’t talking in regards to the doctor: she was talking in regards to the priest. . . That was every part to her. . .
“The State really had no sight of the spiritual, and, in some ways, it pushed it to the margins.”
This had led Mr Burnham to grasp that “for those who don’t start with the person, with names, not numbers, you’ve no likelihood. You’ve got to form of see people’s health as a mixture, not only of physical, social, and mental, but spiritual, too. And, for those who miss that, you’re missing what matters to people.”
Mr Burnham also paid tribute to the part that faith groups in Manchester had played in the course of the pandemic. “We were nervous about vaccination, and we couldn’t reach a few of the communities that we knew we needed to, to kind of really boost the uptake. And it was at that time, I remember any person saying in our meetings, ‘Well, we must now go to the places of worship and see if they may open up and turn into vaccination centres.’ And it was revelatory, because once we did begin to ask for his or her support, the vaccination rate began to vary.
“And the educational for me there was, for those who deliver through places and folks that are trusted, you’ve then got a likelihood to make a difference. If you only keep pondering within the old way of doing things, we’re going to fail increasingly more people and miss the reference to them.”
Analysis, page 16
