The rise of Christian apocalyptic media, resembling books and films focused on the top times, introduced many individuals to the concept of the rapture. Through engaging with series like Left Behind, nevertheless, some individuals began to fret that they might be forgotten by the Lord and forsaken, left to endure the tribulation alone. They associated the rapture with feelings of fear, a phenomenon known today as “rapture anxiety.” And as this area of eschatology became more widespread and popular, churches saw a rise in believers and other individuals in search of to substantiate their salvation to avoid being left behind within the rapture.
What began as a preferred media trend ended up hindering the religion of many. Thus, many individuals view the mention of the rapture with suspicion. Isn’t it just a preferred trend in America and a recent doctrinal development ?
Before we dismiss all teachings of the rapture, though, we must take a look at what Scripture teaches and compare that to the various interpretations found inside Christian belief. Believers from different streams of the church hold varied views on when the rapture will occur, in addition to how this teaching is connected to the second coming of Christ.
The Rapture in Biblical Teaching
The term “rapture” doesn’t appear within the Bible, because it is merely a title that expresses a theological concept. Drawn from 1 Thessalonians 4:17, the term comes from the Latin translation of the Greek word commonly translated as “caught up” within the verse. The idea is that of being snatched away and translated some other place, much like how Philip was carried away by the Holy Spirit and brought to Azotus (see Acts 8:39-40). In basic terms, then, rapture means being caught or snatched away, specifically within the context of believers being taken up by the Lord.
Notice, nevertheless, that the passage in 1 Thessalonians doesn’t tell us what being caught up specifically looks like, and it doesn’t give a direct answer in regards to the timing of the event. Rather, Paul was in search of to offer comfort to the Thessalonian believers, reminding them of their grief that living believers wouldn’t precede those that had died in Christ when receiving resurrection bodies (1 Thessalonians 4:13-15). The emphasis within the passage is to encourage fellow believers with this reminder and truth (1 Thessalonians 4:18).
Of course, theologians who hold different views about eschatology will argue that other verses apply to the rapture, resembling John 14:3 and Matthew 24:31. These are commonly used to support specific views, but being caught up isn’t explicitly mentioned. Thus, the important verse utilized in discussions of the rapture is centered on 1 Thessalonians 4.
Different Views of the Rapture
Depending on denomination and other aspects, churches and individual Christians hold various views regarding the timing and nature of the rapture. For example, Roman Catholic and Orthodox Christians argue that they don’t consider within the rapture as commonly taught, for the reason that ancient position of the church was that the gathering of believers will occur on the second coming. Generally, the emphasis on and development of newer classifications of the rapture are seen predominantly amongst evangelical, as an alternative of mainline, churches.
The common views of the rapture include the next:
Pretribulational View
The rapture will occur before the tribulation occurs. At an unexpected time, before the Antichrist makes a cope with Israel, the church might be snatched away to guard them from the widespread judgment on the earth. Typically, 1 Thessalonians 5:9 is utilized in defense of a pretribulational rapture, for the reason that verse indicates that believers usually are not appointed to suffer wrath.
Pre-wrath View
Christians will endure a lot of the tribulation but might be spared from the outpouring of God’s wrath near the top of the seven years. According to this view, God’s wrath involves only the bowl and trumpet judgment mentioned in Revelation, judgments that the church might be exempt from experiencing (Revelation 8-16). Believers will, thus, be snatched away before this outpouring of wrath.
Midtribulational View
As the name suggests, this view teaches that the rapture will occur in the midst of the tribulation. Most theologians recognize the difference between the overall tribulation and the Great Tribulation, which starts after roughly three and a half years (the midpoint of the tribulation). This view is comparable to the pre-wrath view in that believers might be caught up within the air before the outpouring of God’s wrath with the bowl judgments (Revelation 16).
Posttribulational View
The rapture will occur at the top of the tribulation and happens concurrently the second coming. Believers might be immediately modified and caught up to satisfy Christ within the air and travel with Him as He returns to earth. Jesus’ discourse in Matthew 24 is commonly utilized in support of a posttribulational rapture.
We should note that even inside specific theological systems (resembling Dispensationalism and Covenant Theology), there may be disagreement in regards to the nature of the rapture and its timing. Just because one member espouses a view doesn’t mean that everybody inside their camp agrees with that interpretation. A spectrum exists wherein some members of a system can fall at different places throughout the realm of views. For instance, although a pretribulational view of the rapture is usually connected to Dispensationalism, a Progressive Dispensationalist could also be more open to a midtribulational or posttribulational view, in contrast to a Dispensational Premillennialist who advocates for a pretribulational rapture.
Perceiving Dispensationalism as a Fad Teaching
The important area of criticism in regards to the rapture focuses on a Dispensational Premillennialist approach to the top times. Opponents to this view argue that Dispensationalism is a comparatively latest system, uniquely developed by John Nelson Darby and popularized in America by the Scofield Reference Bible. Because of its “newer” identity, many consider that it doesn’t have the identical support from Christian tradition as other views, especially regarding the rapture and the millennial kingdom.
Other areas of concern that move beyond the criticism of fad teaching are that a pretribulational view of the rapture is escapist and doesn’t adequately cope with Bible verses that speak about Christian persecution and exposure to tribulation. Lots of believers have properly identified that we must always not assume we might be spared suffering because we belong to Christ. History and Scripture testify that we must always expect tribulation as believers. Jesus even stated this as a fact: “I have said this stuff to you, that in me you might have peace. In the world you’ll have tribulation. But take heart; I actually have overcome the world” (John 16:33, ESV).
Furthermore, as a preferred teaching, this method of eschatology has sometimes promoted fear. For example, web sites and literature exist that use the specter of being left behind as an evangelistic tactic to induce people to just accept Jesus. The church might be raptured, they are saying, in order that only believers in Jesus might be preserved from the approaching wrath. They urge individuals to position faith in Christ to avoid being left to suffer the tribulation. Critics rightly indicate the faults of using such methods, reminding fellow Christians that love, not fear, is one of the best technique to point others to the Savior.
Although these criticisms are insightful, Dispensationalism stays a longtime theological system. Scholars and theologians may disagree with it, however the system has contributed to theological thought, biblical interpretation, and a renewed interest in studying the guarantees to Israel and the way they might be fulfilled within the Kingdom. Certain byproducts of this method, resembling the promotion of fear and media representations of the rapture, ought to be seen as mere popular teaching. But the system itself shouldn’t be fully dismissed.
Freedom to Believe in Varying Interpretations and A Call to Focus on Unifying Biblical Truth
Humans have created elaborate timelines and systems of eschatology, and that’s all they’re – human-created models. Many areas of doctrine are based on what people have attempted, to their best ability, to interpret from God’s Word. Sometimes these interpretations are improper or barely off in focus. Hence, we’d like individuals with many various perspectives to contribute to the discussion in regards to the end times. The number of interpretations offers us more opportunities to see issues we didn’t notice before or to acknowledge the contribution of verses we might need earlier disregarded as unconnected.
The rapture, like views of styles in worship or spiritual gifts, isn’t a primary doctrine. It doesn’t have the identical significance because the virgin birth, the sacrificial death of Jesus, and His resurrection. Our salvation isn’t depending on whether we consider within the rapture or hold a pretribulational, midtribulational, or posttribulational view. Thus, Christian freedom allows for a wide range of opinions about belief within the rapture and its timing.
None of us can say with certainty that we all know exactly what is going to occur through the end times, resembling when events will occur or in what sequence. What we are able to know, and affirm with other believers, is that Jesus will return and we are going to live with Him on a latest earth. The ancient Christian hope isn’t tied to a particular timeline. Rather, we’re looking forward to the approaching of our Savior, the physical and visual return of Jesus.
Let us not get so caught up in systems that we lose sight of what Scripture emphasizes – that we must always live holy lives in anticipation of the approaching renewal (2 Peter 3:11), and that we must always endure suffering and persecution patiently with the knowledge that our Lord is coming soon (Revelation 21:7). May we add our voices to the prayer at the top of Revelation for the Lord Jesus to come back, entrusting the opposite details to Him (Revelation 22:20).
Photo Credit: ©Unsplash/Magda Smolen
