23.4 C
New York
Thursday, September 17, 2026

European court accused of overreach after ruling against Poland in disability abortion case

The European Court of Human Rights (Photo: Getty/iStock)

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has come under criticism after ruling against Poland in a case concerning abortion on the grounds of disability. 

The legal challenge was brought by a lady who travelled abroad for an abortion after Poland’s 2020 Constitutional Tribunal decision to strike down abortion on the grounds of fetal disability. The woman travelled abroad for the abortion after her baby was diagnosed with a severe abnormality. 

Poland’s 2020 court decision affirmed that unborn children with disabilities deserve equal protection under the law and that each human being has an inherent dignity. 

The ECHR has now ruled that the rights of the lady were violated. This follows a previous 2023 ruling by the ECHR that Poland’s change to the law in disability-based abortions was a violation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the fitting to non-public and family life.

Dr Felix Böllmann, Director of European Advocacy for legal advocacy group ADF International (ADF) criticised the November 13 ruling, arguing that Poland was inside its rights to find out its own laws on the matter.

“With this judgment the European Court of Human Rights has interfered in a matter that belongs squarely under Polish jurisdiction,” he said. 

“Poland has each the sovereign prerogative and the duty to guard all innocent human life.

“Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal acted courageously to guard children with disabilities from discrimination before birth — a goal fully consistent with international human rights law.”

He said the judgment was a “troubling” sign that the ECHR was “willing to overstep its role”. 

It follows a recent joint letter signed by nine EU countries – Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland – which called for an “open-minded conversation” about how the European Convention on Human Rights is interpreted. 

“The Court should return to its original mission of protecting real human rights, not inventing false ones,” Böllmann continued.

He called on EU institutions to guard the unborn, and respect the fitting of countries to legislate in accordance with their very own constitutional and moral frameworks. 

“The European Court should uphold, not undermine, the basic right to life, and this ruling severely undermines the fitting to lifetime of the disabled unborn. No baby should suffer life-ending discrimination within the womb,” he said.

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Sign up to receive your exclusive updates, and keep up to date with our latest articles!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Latest Articles