The graves at the sting of the orphanage tell a story of despair. The rough planks within the cracked earth are painted with the names of youngsters, most of them dead within the Nineties. That was before the HIV drugs arrived.
Today, the orphanage in Kenya’s capital is a happier, more hopeful place for youngsters with HIV. But a political fight happening within the United States is threatening this system that helps to maintain them and hundreds of thousands of others world wide alive.
The reason for the threat? Abortion.
The AIDS epidemic has killed greater than 40 million people for the reason that first recorded cases in 1981, tripling child mortality and carving a long time off life expectancy within the hardest-hit areas of Africa, where the fee of treatment put it out of reach. Horrified, Republican U.S. President George W. Bush and Congress twenty years ago created what’s described as the biggest commitment by any nation in history to combat a single disease.
The program referred to as the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR, partners with nonprofit groups to offer HIV/AIDS medication to hundreds of thousands world wide. It strengthens local and national health care systems, cares for youngsters orphaned by AIDS, and provides job training for people at-risk.
Now a small variety of Republican lawmakers are endangering the soundness of this system, which officials say has saved 25 million lives in 55 countries from Ukraine to Brazil to Indonesia. That includes the lives of 5.5 million infants born HIV-free.
At the Nairobi orphanage, program manager Paul Mulongo has a message for Washington.
“Let them know that the lives of those children we’re taking good care of are purely of their hands,” Mulongo says.
The issue of abortion has been a sensitive one since PEPFAR’s inception in 2003. But every time this system got here up for renewal in Congress, Republicans and Democrats were in a position to put aside partisan politics to support a program that is long been seen because the vanguard of world aid.
“Most eras in countries are measured by lack of life in war and famine and pandemic,” said Tom Hart, president of the ONE Campaign, a nonpartisan organization that worked with Bush to create this system. “This era has been measured in lives saved.” The campaign has published a letter from dozens of religion leaders to Congress calling PEPFAR “a story of medical miracles and mercy.”
But lawmakers’ bipartisan support is cracking as this system is ready to run out at the tip of September. The trouble began within the spring, when the Heritage Foundation, an influential conservative Washington think tank, accused the Biden administration of using PEPFAR “to advertise its domestic radical social agenda overseas.”
The group pointed to recent State Department language that called for PEPFAR to partner with organizations that advocate for “institutional reforms in law and policy regarding sexual, reproductive and economic rights of girls.” Conservatives argued that is code for attempting to integrate abortion with HIV/AIDS prevention, a claim the administration has denied.
In language echoing the early, harsh years of the epidemic, Heritage called HIV/AIDS a “lifestyle disease” that must be suppressed by “education, moral suasion and legal sanctions.” It beneficial halving U.S. funding for PEPFAR, saying poor countries should bear more of the prices.
Shortly after that, Republican Rep. Chris Smith, a longtime supporter of PEPFAR who wrote the bill reauthorizing it in 2018, said he wouldn’t move forward with reauthorization this time unless it bars NGOs who use any funding to offer or promote abortion services. His threat comes with weight as he chairs the House Foreign Affairs subcommittee with jurisdiction over this system’s funding.
But since that proposal faces stiff opposition from Democrats in Congress, Smith, with support from distinguished anti-abortion groups, desires to cut PEPFAR’s usual five-year funding to at least one yr if that ban isn’t included. He said that may allow lawmakers annually to revisit contracts with partners they imagine may support or provide abortion services.
“It’s a false narrative that claims that you could’t do (this system) yr by yr as we try to guard the unborn child,” Smith told The Associated Press.
Supporters of this system say that under existing U.S. law, partners are already prohibited from using its funding for abortion services. The head of PEPFAR, John Nkengasong, told the AP he knew of no instance of this system’s money going directly or not directly to fund abortion services.
He warned that any instability within the flow of U.S. funding for PEPFAR could have dangerous implications for health globally, including within the United States. The key to controlling AIDS, he said, is the peace of mind that infected people have a pill to take every day.
Without that, the virus could come back, ”and about 20 million lives is likely to be lost in the approaching years,” he said. “The fragile gains that we’ve achieved will likely be lost.”
In Africa, many PEPFAR partners and recipients in largely conservative countries don’t support abortion either because of non secular beliefs. But the concept this system reliant on the regular supply of HIV drugs might be subject to political winds is a cause for alarm.
“If PEPFAR goes, who’s going to fulfill that cost?” asked Josephine Kaleebi, who leads a company in Uganda that helped this system’s first-ever recipient of HIV treatment medication.
“We are proud to say that the primary recipient is alive,” Kaleebi said.
The group, Reach Out Mbuya Community Health Initiative, was founded by members of Uganda’s Catholic Church, which is against abortion. In the reception area, portraits of priests line the partitions.
But Reach Out helps anyone who walks in needing HIV drugs, Kaleebi said. About 6,000 individuals are served, lots of them “the extremely most vulnerable” from one in every of the poorest areas of the capital, Kampala.
Mark Dybul, who helped create and lead PEPFAR under Bush, warned that weakening PEPFAR would also hurt the diplomatic goodwill the U.S. has created in developing regions.
“It’s no secret that we’re in a geopolitical struggle for influence in Africa with Russia and China,” he said. “And our biggest influence in some ways, visible and most impactful, is PEPFAR.” A spokesperson for former president Bush declined comment.
In neighboring Kenya, Bernard Mwololo believes he’s alive due to the drugs that PEPFAR provides. “Sometimes it’s so crazy once you hear people saying that these HIV drugs must be bought by the local government,” he said. “I’m telling you, they’ll’t manage it.”
The 36-year-old, now an HIV activist, has lived most of his life on the Nairobi orphanage after his parents died of AIDS. He recalled arriving and learning that he could have hope. He was enrolled in a greater school, was given a bicycle and ate balanced meals.
The number of youngsters in sub-Saharan Africa newly orphaned by AIDS reached a peak of 1.6 million in 2004, the yr that PEPFAR began its rollout of HIV drugs, researchers wrote in a defense of this system published by The Lancet medical journal last month. In 2021, the number of recent orphans had dropped to 382,000.
And deaths of infants and young children from AIDS within the region have dropped by 80%.
Now the orphanage is transformed. Children dart around playing soccer or swing within the colourful play area. Some are among the many 1.4 million children and adults living with HIV in Kenya, in line with UNAIDS. More than 1 million have received free HIV drugs due to PEPFAR.
Stopping PEPFAR can be like committing “global genocide,” said Mulongo, the orphanage program manager.
He recalled how helpless he felt watching children die before HIV drugs were available. Almost twenty years ago, they’d lose at the least 30 children a month to AIDS.
Elsewhere in Nairobi, 16-year-old Idah Musimbi is a component of a generation that has grown up without the fear that an HIV diagnosis was a probable death sentence.
She displayed the pills which have given her a way of normalcy. She contracted HIV at birth.
“I don’t think I might live for long if these drugs stopped coming. My grandparents cannot afford to purchase food day by day, let alone these ARVs,” she said.
Her grandfather David Shitika, a pastor, said he owes the lives of his granddaughter and her mother to PEPFAR. His daughter was diagnosed with HIV in 1995, when many individuals were dying.
“It was called the slimming killer disease,” he said. “Nobody desired to live with an infected person, and those that died were wrapped in nylon bags before burial” for fear of infection.
Now he hopes that the Republicans’ threat to PEPFAR will fade, and that his granddaughter will go on to review law and achieve her dream of becoming a judge.
“I need to inform the American people, God bless you,” Shitika said. “I have no idea why you made the decision to assist us.”
___
Amiri and Knickmeyer reported from Washington. AP writers Rodney Muhumuza in Kampala, Uganda, contributed.
