Matthew 5:38-42
Our Scripture today is regarding retaliation and what Jesus teaches about it. In the Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 5:38-42, Jesus teaches how one can reply to insults and persecution. The legal principle of “eye for a watch” was established in Old Testament law to forestall excessive retaliation, punishments were to be proportional to the offense. Jesus, then again, sets a really different standard for private matters. Christians are commanded to endure fairly than retaliate against insults and unfair treatment. The following passage, which talks about loving one’s enemies, gives this concept an energetic twist.
In verse 38:
Mercy was God’s plan for this law. It read, “Make the punishment fit the crime” and was given to the judges. It was not an instruction for private vengeance. These laws were put in place to maintain vengeance at a minimum and to make it easier for the court to impose punishment that was not too harsh or too light. However, this phrase was getting used by some to justify their vengeance against others. “I used to be just doing to him what he did to me,” remains to be a typical excuse for retaliation by some.
Exodus 21:23-25, And if any mischief follows, then thou shalt give life for all times, Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
Leviticus 24:19-20, And if a person cause a blemish in his neighbour; as he hath done, so shall it’s done to him; Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a person, so shall it’s done to him again.
Deuteronomy 19:21, And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for all times, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.
Most of the time, our first response once we are wronged is to get back at them by getting even. Jesus, then again, instructed us to assist those that had wronged us. Our desire should be to like and forgive fairly than to maintain a running tally of events. This is supernatural, not natural. Only God can empower us to like like He does. We ought to wish for individuals who have wronged us fairly than plotting retribution.
In verses 39-42:
These statements were offensive to many Jews on the time of Jesus. They didn’t need a Messiah to guide a military revolt against Rome who would turn the opposite cheek. They desired retaliation against their hated enemies under Roman oppression. Jesus, then again, proposed a radical latest approach to injustice. We should freely quit our rights fairly than fighting for them. Jesus said that it’s more vital to indicate mercy and justice than to receive it. But to today, many Christians still appear to disagree with this thought process. We can definitely see the world’s response is against it.
Romans 12:17, Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest within the sight of all men.
1 Corinthians 6:7, Now, due to this fact, there may be utterly a fault amongst you because ye go to law one with one other. Why do ye not fairly take unsuitable? Why do ye not fairly suffer yourselves to be defrauded?
1 Peter 3:9, Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
In verse 40:
In this verse, the second reason that Jesus mentioned not resisting an evil person begins to take shape. In the next section, which is about loving enemies, that idea is elaborated much more. An act of trust within the God who cares for us and works through us is refusing to withstand, which suggests to reply. Believers can use personal attacks to show the facility and goodness of God. For the time being, Christ provides illustrations of what it means to withstand others.
Jesus now imagines a scenario wherein someone would sue someone for his or her coat, going beyond the petty insults. In the time of Jesus, most individuals wore this as their inner garment. This literally means “the shirt off our back” in today’s terminology. Jesus instructs us to easily give that person each our coat and our cloak, the outer garment, fairly than fighting them in court. Christians have the facility to turn out to be an example of faithful strength within the face of what others consider to be insults and abuse.
In verse 41:
Jesus now refers to a type of forced march. This illustration made a transparent allusion to the Roman occupiers of Israel, who continuously treated the Jewish people harshly and unfairly. It would seem that Roman soldiers could seize any Jewish citizen of their selecting and compel them to hold baggage or other objects for a typical mile. Naturally, a desire for vengeance could be sparked by such an oppressive and intrusive act. It would entice people to violently overthrow the Romans from a cultural perspective.
Some of Jesus’s first followers believed that His mission as Messiah was to expel the occupiers from Israel and overthrow them. That would shock His subsequent command to not say no and go above and beyond what was asked of you. This phrase could even mean “walk with them one other two miles,” which might make it a complete of three miles, depending on the way it is interpreted.
Some people interpret these words as appeasement and weakness when taken out of context and examine them with cynicism. The natural inclination is to imagine that Jesus meant to weakly undergo bullies. Jesus, then again, is describing a one who is capable of take charge and provides an adversary greater than they asked for. Paul will say this within the book of Romans.
Romans 12:21, “Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.”
In verse 42:
Jesus describes a special but related scenario on this instance. The previous command suggested that somebody with more power than us, like a Roman soldier or a wealthy community member, was giving the order. People with less power are mentioned on this statement. By instructing His followers to submit even to those at the underside of society, Jesus extends the sooner command.
Jesus instructs His disciples to lend money or possessions to anyone who asks and to freely give to beggars. It may appear as if these commands are the weakest position of all, by accepting an unreasonable request from a one who has no authority over you. This could also be an emotionally tied or manipulative appeal fairly than an unfair insult or abusive command.
Deuteronomy 15:8, But thou shalt open thine hand wide unto him, and shalt surely lend him sufficient for his need, in that which he wanteth.
Because now we have made the choice to offer, Jesus is demonstrating that doing so is a strong act. More importantly, now we have decided to place our faith in God to proceed providing for us despite the fact that He has given us every part totally free. This command doesn’t imply being naive or gullible about charity, just as Jesus’ previous words don’t prohibit legitimate self-defense.
Luke 22:36, Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a handbag, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.
Matthew 10:16, Behold, I send you forth as sheep within the midst of wolves: be ye due to this fact clever as serpents, and harmless as doves.
2 Timothy 3:10, But thou hast fully known my doctrine, manner of life, purpose, faith, longsuffering, charity, patience,
It does imply that when someone expresses a legitimate need, the suitable response is to offer with intention and sacrifice. Are we retaliating against those that do us harm? Do we show sick will and begrudgingly give to those in need? How does this affect our Christian behavior?
Photo Credit: ©Getty Images/Atstock Productions
