14.7 C
New York
Friday, November 15, 2024

Church seeks co-chair for Response Group to Jay and Wilkinson safeguarding reports

AN INDEPENDENT co-chair for the group responding to recent reports on safeguarding within the Church of England is being sought and — not because the post was initially advertised — will likely be paid.

The commercial, posted on recruitment web sites, originally described the post as “unremunerated with reasonable expenses paid”. This was later updated to “supplier fee paid”, but no figure was specified.

The Church of England, the ad says, is trying to appoint someone with “safeguarding expertise from outside of the Church who can work closely with the Church of England’s Safeguarding Bishop to facilitate the Response Group meetings”. The length of the commitment is from March to August 2024, “and possibly beyond”, and the “successful candidate will likely be a senior leader, with excellent communication, and interpersonal skills”.

The closing date for applications is 17 March.

It is known that the Response Group will conduct a consultation on how the Church should reply to the recommendations of Professor Alexis Jay (News, 23 February) and Dr Sarah Wilkinson (News, 15 December 2023) of their reports.

The consultation’s findings will then be passed to the National Safeguarding Steering Group, and the Archbishops’ Council, who will put a proposal before the General Synod.

The timing and and content of the decision for a co-chair would suggest that, although the response group has not yet come together, it’s hoped that proposals will likely be put before the Synod on the July group of sessions.

Shortly before the Synod’s meeting last month, a document containing terms of reference for the group, and a partial list of members, was published on the C of E website.

During the Synod debate, the lead bishop for safeguarding, the Bishop of Stepney, Dr Joanne Grenfell, assured members that the Response Group wouldn’t be making a call, but overseeing the consultation process (News, 1 March).

In the document, Dr Grenfell is listed because the chair of the Response Group; and Dr Jamie Harrison, an Archbishops’ Council member and Chair of the House of Laity, is listed because the group’s deputy chair. It is currently unclear what part he’ll play within the group, in the sunshine of the appointment of a co-chair.

It is known that the choice to hunt an independent co-chair was made in the sunshine of feedback after the publication of the document.

In the safeguarding debate on 24 February, several Synod members criticised the formation of the group, owing to the involvement of people that is likely to be considered chargeable for the present situation

A lay member, Professor Helen King, has written that “the composition and the method for the Response Group suggest that the ‘independence’ of safeguarding will begin with a terrible sense of familiarity” (Letters, 1 March).

It is predicted that, when the membership has been finalised, the names will likely be published, aside from those of members who’ve been drawn from a separate recruitment process for survivors of church-based abuse.

Crompton to proceed review work for one 12 months. On Monday, an announcement posted on the Church of England website announced that Kevin Crompton has been engaged to proceed for an extra 12 months the work of commissioning the reviews which had been promised by the Independent Safeguarding Boad (ISB) before it was disbanded (News, 15 September 2023).

Last month, a bunch of 11 survivors of church-related abuse said that they were no closer to receiving their reviews (News, 23 February). Their statement said that “not one survivor is currently have their review progressed” by Mr Crompton, contradicting a document released on behalf of the House of Bishops and the Archbishops’ Council which had said that “several people” were working with him.

Asked to clarify the apparent discrepancy, a spokesperson for Church House said: “We understand that plenty of victims and survivors have been engaging with Kevin Crompton about reviews of cases, although it will not be appropriate for us to present more details.”

Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe

Sign up to receive your exclusive updates, and keep up to date with our latest articles!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Latest Articles