Over 2,000 people have signed a petition protesting a recent silent disco at Canterbury Cathedral.
The cathedral was founded by St Augustine in 597 AD and stays a crucial centre for pilgrimage because the mother church of the worldwide Anglican Communion, the seat of the Archbishop of Canterbury, and a UNESCO World Heritage Site. It was also the place of the martyrdom of English archbishop Thomas Becket.
The silent disco featured pop music from the 90s and alcohol was on sale within the constructing for the event. A silent vigil was held at the identical time outside the cathedral by Christian protesters.
Despite the furore, more cathedrals have signed as much as host silent discos of their buildings in the approaching weeks and months, including Hereford, Leeds, St Albans, Coventry, Sheffield and Manchester. In addition to a silent disco in May, Manchester Cathedral also has a Punk Rock Club night planned for 29 February.
A petition on Change.org called ‘Anglican Deans, Stop turning our Great Cathedrals into Nightclubs’ has been signed by 2,140 people.
It accuses cathedral deans of desecrating the sacred buildings and says that the place for silent discos is in nightclubs, not cathedrals.
It calls on Christians to voice their opposition and for deans to make their cathedral buildings a house of prayer.
“The desecration won’t stop unless we resist, with petitions and prayers, to indicate the clergy their errors and awaken in people’s hearts a renewed reverence of our sacred places,” it says.
“We the undersigned oppose all desecration of our historic holy places, and particularly their use as nightclubs. Dear Anglican Deans, please stop the discos and make the Cathedrals houses of prayer over again.”
Other Christians have questioned the event.
Christian Concern tweeted, “If Canterbury Cathedral’s goal was to draw young and real worshipers, a silent disco was definitely not the best way.”
Priest and blogger Steve Kneale questioned whether there was any point to churches filling their buildings with people if there isn’t any intention to share the Gospel.
“I see no reason to consider we’ve got achieved anything of evangelistic price by any means once we see these items,” he said.
“Simply ‘getting them in’ isn’t similar to doing anything for the gospel. Simply ‘getting them in’ doesn’t lead anybody nearer to Christ. In and of itself, ‘getting them in’ doesn’t really achieve anything in any respect,” he wrote on his blog.
Vicar and commentator Rev Daniel French said, “If a silent disco within the birthplace of English Christianity elicits revulsion where, say, a theatrical performance or concert doesn’t, it is because it is not only a secular use of a sacred space, but a parodic one: a caricature of Holy Communion.”
Christian commentator Adrian Hilton said, “The Dean and Chapter of Canterbury Cathedral deem this ‘silent disco’ to be an activity ‘resembling befit[s] the House of God’ (Canon F16). I take a broad view of mission, but I feel it inclines toward profanity ‘inconsistent with the sanctity’ (F15) of the shrine of St Thomas Becket.”
